Tuesday, October 15, 2013

The Catcher in the Rye II



  SPOILER ALERT.... kinda  


J.D. Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye”, Pretty interesting, might hold on to the book for a couple more days in order to jot down some quotes and re-read some of my favorite parts and gather more final thoughts. The book tells the story of Holden Caulfield, the narrator. Holden is 16 years old and feels rather uncomfortable with almost everything and anything he comes in contact with. A bit of a cynic, Holden comes from a wealthy family, and I say this because he has attended several private schools; his parents reside in a townhouse in Fifth Avenue, he describes many childhood memories that most middle-class or lower-class children wouldn’t be able to relate too such as his summer house in Maine and playing golf with his family at a country club in Long Island. Throughout the story, Holden is constantly in a depressed mood, there are one or two instances of happiness I can account for. He hates communicating with people, he believes he is surrounded by “phony” people in every aspect of his life. There is this one part where he expresses his desire to live in a cabin close to the woods and away from everybody, another where he plans to run away from home and hitch-hike his way out west and once he settles down, he’ll pretend to be a deaf-mute, that way, if anybody wanted to communicate with him, they would have no alternative other than to “write stuff down on a piece of paper”. I personally think Holden is just a spoiled brat, for lack of a better word, who thinks he has nothing to lose and unaware of the abundance of resources at his disposal.



BUT WAIT…

Don’t like stories revolving around spoiled brats? Hold your horses, there’s a lesson to be learned. The most intriguing characters of the book, besides Holden, have to be the two teachers Holden goes to seek advice from, unintentionally or at least subconsciously. He visits them knowing they’re going to lecture him about the truth; the truth I’ve been wanting to tell him myself, the truth that even he, Caulfield, knows he should hear but doesn’t want to. The truth that he has to grow up, that he ought to be more mature, and take advantages of the opportunities around him. He visits them knowing those lectures will happen, knowing that certain conversation might come about or at least with the idea of knowing that conversation might take place but hoping it won’t, certainly a sixteen year old trait. In both cases, he visits the teachers just before he is about to make a decision to head off somewhere, which is pretty interesting and maybe the author did that purpose. The first was before he was going to leave his school and head home and the second was before he was going to leave home and head off out west. In my opinion, these two characters, Mr. Spencer and Mr. Antolini and the conversations shared with Holden defined the book for me; the author really nailed it with that one. I think we can all relate to Holden in a way, in the sense that we all wish things to go our way and have perfect things happen to us but of course, we must be realistic and stop living in Disney land. There is certainly no justification towards Holden’s behavior throughout most of the book, though. Part of me wishes to give him the benefit of the doubt in a way, justify his lack of maturity due to his young age but he is certainly a piece of work. A cynic; everything affects his mood, makes him depressed and on top of that he doesn’t want to change his behavior. After reading this book, I sort of dislike Holden Caulfield but at the same time see why he would do or say certain things that mixed feeling proves how brilliantly this book was written. J.D. Salinger left me hanging by the book’s end, I didn’t know how or what to feel. He left me to reflect, and that’s always a sign of a good piece of writing. Although I may dislike Holden, or at least most of his attitude, I must admit that I learned because of him. Salinger’s use of the “ducks at central park” metaphor, in which Holden kept pondering and asking anybody he’d have a chance to ask during a conversation, if they knew where the ducks, that swam in a lake at central park, went during the winter time. It must’ve been around the 3rd or 4th time Salinger brought it up in the story that I realized why he kept mentioning it. It occurred to me that Holden, himself, is “the ducks” he keeps asking about and the lake, where the ducks swim in, is “home”. Holden was unintentionally or subconsciously trying to find out where the ducks went during the wintertime because he himself wanted to somewhere to go. He had no direction, and in some way he wanted to know of somewhere he can leave to.

The conversation Holden had with the cab driver, is the most accurate illustration of the metaphor, in which Holden asks Horwitz about the ducks at central park…


Caulfield: “Hey, Horwitz,” I said. “You ever pass by the lagoon in Central Park? Down by Central Park South?”

Horwitz: “The what?”

Caulfield: “The lagoon. That little lake, like, there. Where the ducks are. You know.”

Horwitz: “Yeah, what about it?”

Caulfield: “Well, you know the ducks that swim around in it? In the springtime and all? Do you happen to know where they go in the wintertime, by any chance?”

Horwitz: “Where who goes?”

Caulfield: “The ducks. Do you know, by any chance? I mean does somebody come around in a truck or something and take them away, or do they fly away by themselves--go south or something?”

Horwitz: “How the hell should I know? How the hell should I know a stupid thing like that?”

Caulfield: “Well, don’t get sore about it,”

Horwitz: “Who’s sore? Nobody’s sore.”

Horwitz: The fish don’t go no place. They stay right where they are, the fish. Right in the goddam lake.”

Caulfield: “The fish—that’s different. The fish is different. I’m talking about the ducks,”

Horwitz: “What’s different about it? Nothin’s different about it. It’s tougher for the fish, the winter and all, than it is for the ducks, for chrissake. Use your head, for chrissake.”

Caulfield: “All right. What do they do, the fish and all, when that whole little lake’s a solid block of ice, people skating on it and all?”

Horwitz: What the hell ya mean what do they do? They stay right where they are, for chrissake.”

Caulfield: They can’t just ignore the ice. They can’t just ignore it.”

Horwitz: “Who’s ignoring it? Nobody’s ignoring it! They live right in the goddam ice. It’s their nature, for chrissake. They get frozen right in one position for the whole winter.”

Caulfield: “Yeah? What do they eat, then? I mean if they’re frozen solid, they can’t swim around looking for food and all.”

Horwitz: “Their bodies for chrissake—what’sa matter with ya? Their bodies take in the nutrition and all, right through the goddam seaweed and crap that’s in the ice. They got their pores open the whole time. That’s their nature, for chrissake. See what I mean?”

Caulfield: “Oh… Would you care to stop off and have a drink with me somewhere?”

Horwitz: “I ain’t got time for no liquor, bud, how the hell old are you, anyways? Why ain’tcha home in bed?”

Caulfield: “I’m not tired.”
                      
                        Moments later…

Horwitz: “Listen, if you was a fish, Mother Nature’d take care of you, wouldn’t she? Right? You don’t think them fish just die when it gets to be winter, do ya?”

Caulfield: “No, but--“

Horwitz: “You’re goddam right they don’t,”

            Sometimes a pretty long book, that appears to be endless, can make up for it by having three or four moments that make everything come together; sweet as tea. The attention to detail, J.D. Salinger’s got enough to go around.

No comments:

Post a Comment